Explainer
Raydium Burn & Earn, and what locked liquidity really protects
Burning a liquidity position is the clearest promise a token creator can make on-chain. It is also routinely oversold as a safety guarantee. Here is precisely what it does and does not cover.
Reviewed and updated 2026-09-17
Short answer
What a liquidity position is, in one paragraph
When someone supplies both sides of a trading pair, the pool issues them a position representing that deposit. Holding it means you can take the liquidity back out. That is useful for a genuine market maker and dangerous for a token buyer, because the person holding the position can drain the market the token trades in. Burning the position destroys the withdrawal right permanently; the assets stay in the pool with nobody able to claim them.
What burning protects against — and what it does not
| Risk | Removed by burning liquidity? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Creator withdraws the pool | Yes | There is no longer a position that can be redeemed |
| Price falls because holders sell | No | The pool keeps quoting; heavy selling still moves the price down |
| A large holder dumps their allocation | No | Burning affects the pool, not anyone's token balance |
| Thin liquidity causing violent moves | No | A small locked pool is still a small pool |
| Token authority abuse, such as extra minting | No | That is a separate mint setting and must be checked separately |
| The project simply being abandoned | No | Locked liquidity does not create activity or maintenance |
Why the 'Earn' half exists
How StonkFun says it uses this
StonkFun's launch page states that each launch opens a one-sided Raydium market and that the liquidity is permanently locked through Burn & Earn, with the creator retaining a share of pool fees — 0.5% of a 1% pool, or 1.5% of a 2% pool. That is the platform's own description of its process. It is a claim we can read but not audit for you: the way to confirm it for any specific token is to open the pool on an explorer and look at the position yourself.
Our StonkFun review lists this alongside the other claims we could and could not verify, and the launchpad comparison shows how it differs from a bonding-curve model.
How to check a specific token's liquidity yourself
Take the mint address — never the ticker — and open it on a Solana explorer or a market data site that shows the pool. Look for the liquidity pool's address, then inspect the position holder. A burned position shows no owner able to redeem it. Compare the pool's total liquidity with the token's market capitalisation: a token with a large capitalisation and a tiny locked pool is fragile regardless of the lock. The same mint discipline is explained on our contract address page.
Is locked liquidity the same as an audit?
Can burned liquidity ever be recovered?
Does a one-sided pool mean there is nothing on the other side?
Does burning liquidity make a token safe to buy?
Sources and verification
Checked 2026-09-15.